Are Grounded Theory and Action Research Compatible? Considerations for Methodological Triangulation

Authors

  • Anna Azulai MacEwan University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33524/cjar.v21i2.485

Keywords:

Constructivist grounded theory, Participant engagement, Participatory action research, Qualitative inquiry, Triangulation

Abstract

This paper explores the prospects of combining Grounded Theory (GT) and Action Research (AR) methodologies to spark further methodological discussion. GT and AR methodologies are sometimes used together in the same study without a discussion of their methodological compatibility. However, different iterations of GT and various forms of AR may inform the level of mutual compatibility. The goal of this conceptual paper is to answer two questions: Which iteration of GT could be more compatible with which form of AR? What benefits and challenges would such a methodological combination pose? The author presents a brief comparative review of GT and AR approaches, commenting on the intriguing complementarities of these methodologies and the benefits of their triangulation in social research. The author concludes that, although the prospect of combining GT and AR is promising, it undeniably requires further scrutiny in the applied research.   

Author Biography

Anna Azulai, MacEwan University

Anna Azulai is Assistant Professor in the School of Social Work, Faculty of Health and Community Studies at MacEwan University, Canada. Dr Azulai is a clinical social worker, educator, and researcher with interests in mental health, aging, and inter-professional collaboration.

Downloads

Published

2021-03-27

Issue

Section

Articles